Cut the Cow Pie!

"Open source intelligence" or We Gee Bored?
Or grow the pie?

SEGUE:
Not to pun on CP or PC, but Craven Politics?
I think we found the opposite of PC, or pie cutter. 
That's a more eh? 

My original intent was to pun or posit the opposite of PC. 
Politial Correctness, the Whine of Progress.
But it*** may be parsed* as Craven -v-  Politics.

* Romney / Obama
[Foot note or b**PS ?]
**(ad?s)  wonting to avoid gee/PS.
*** that posit

[Pardon my dimentional(and anachronistic) asterisks and acronyms, but B**ingo.]
[Note under ac"ron"yms is an anachronism. i.e. late link re: callus political calculus ]
[speaking of anachronism: just turning on Thom Hartmann with Mike Papantonio with caller on justice appointments question of obstruction and my pinnacle of politics]

[Note (2.0) The triangles are not the pie(or pi cutter), they are two dimensional, i.e. a tetrahedron.   Speaking of spell check. ]

NOTE: Charts of Sorts.



PC / Hypocrisy Round Table

My main PC is down, but Politically Correct is the term I mean. Spending the last several days on a trip to Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park there is a lot that has piled up or slipped off the table.* Edwards. Greens. Economics. Gregoire. FBI investigation

It is a shame that Edwards has been potentially removed from further service to the country while greater problems hamper so few Republicans. I don't doubt he will continue to work hard. As for the next four links the thread is economics which needs further hard work.

Not to mention Georgia.
e.g.? Hypocrisy runs round it.
Who is Bush to tell Russia what to expect now? I won't touch that for now.

e.g. (note the other link's letters.) Except for F for potential follow up of failures. Don't forget the AAA link above.

Economics seems to trump all sense sometimes.
By George or Georgia, I believe I did it. (see trumps)

But these links do take a careful read to catch the nuance of my thread. And money not being the only factor or party to our equations, I urge participation in the process, and if you can't pick one of the two major parties, make sure that your vote counts, and know that it will, even if you waste it. Of course that is another story and ironically links to how the buck is passed.

* now I have piled on more than enough and hope to follow-up with other matters, speaking of PC; my computer and Politically Correct. The latter always requires context and is not always a con text, let alone a pre-text. And given the runaround that words can provide it may be sensible that there is no use for protext.(without a capital P)

I'm a PC.

Not to be PC,
but a Jobs loss is everybody's loss.

Not to compare apples and oranges,
but to be Buddhist and Billionaire?
Not to pun completely or cherry pick,
I mean pop culture.




[I guess it is in reaction to someone* who used the death of Steve Jobs to demean those who occupy wallstreet, I take a different path. Not to give a RIP in vain.]

* that someone is not linked on this post, but they used the Slate link under "pop culture".

INET

Joseph Stiglitz: Economics Has to Come to Terms with Wealth and Income Inequality
Xavier Gabaix: NFRY / PC

While reading the first I imagined a curve representing a tipping point and it's margins.  I also considered that dominoes can tip either way, but that is not the game called Dominoes. Then I properly applied the Laffer Curve but thought of a gulch of sorts.  (Ctrl F. Newtonian: not to mention 3-body problems.)  See PC and NFRY.  THE POINT ? [!] (Poe Pen dull  em?)

12-20-14
The mess ~ age is the message.  Not knot (~) exactly [!]
Fail fast/Bohemian Gravity/Enantiodromia=2#/8th. (Bohemian Irony Dimensions ... ?)

Realmiffication

[HELP HAITI!]

The Butterfly Effect and/or(ofor) Real PC[*].
No tongue-in-cheek but... ironic misuse of powers.
Just call me cater-pillar-e.

(For the nuance * or culture** challenged, my apologies for making use of tragedy[***] but culture is often misused.)

* the last "culture" link and "misused" in this case will take one to the lyrics and the long version of... (a meditation?)
** Clash of Civilizations

*** unused(3) astral risks or rather correction to title: originally or intended

footnote: (3),applies to the title and TO mention :) asterisks and links; sometimes scroll over, sometimes right click, but bold and italics are hints.(also see comment)

[HELP HAITI!]

[*] asterisk for update to add link1-15-10: Real PC? Political Cynicism?
[**] also 1-15-10 (of tragedy)and error which are not always mistakes but lessons

PC [^]

Pathological[!] Corner*

Kant we all get along without going to Hegel?
Not without Hume or Mill.
Forgot the punch line.**

* (b.s. )
** the third clause will come to me(was it the bottom line?)

[!] =  "..." or (sic){L} (i.e.) ePH'n pun
Related googles: a, b, c

Inspiration: perspectivism on progress
[Un-PC or Ahegelian? Or Perspective Catch.]

11-23-13 The Foundation [!]***

*** routing branches (knot too frack) Hegelian Punditry
{spoiler alert} [^]  R "air quotes" needed?

FAUX CULTIAN?

Pop Culture [*] and big Do Do!

[Source threads: [A], [B].

[I should note that I have not even caught Mad Men or The Wire but they might be following us and I allude to the deeper threads, which just might hinge on the word reconstruction as much as deconstruction.]

[Hint: "PC" is a Beckian tangent(wisecrack or side crack), while "Do Do" is a mess age we are in and must "read" as "well/to do". P.S. not pronounced "doh, doh" but that is another tangent or non-dough dew.]
[P.S.2.0 my "original intent" was to avoid "a ribble", but it could be unavoidable without a revamping of Keynesian economics or at least an imparting of Try-Go-No Metrics.]

* Update 5-6-10 P.C. Explained see Hint link added under "Beckian".

Democracy Upheld! (5-4) (R/x)**

Not to spike the ball. 
Mandate will become a tax!

Well... that was my idea or interpretation of the bill, but that was FOX News' claim.
But my original ball that might have been a spike was "Democrats Upheld" but Obamacare or the Affordable Care Act, is a bi-partisan bill, so I cannot claim a victory for Democrats.  It is a victory for congress and the political progress.  It is a victory for Obama and bi-partisanship.  Not that victory is a Burger King*, or having it my way.  I should admit that recently I thought that part of the ruling would be kicking the can down the road, since some of the provisions don't go into effect till 2014. 
Oops, in plain English, I may have been right about the can.
Senator Dan Coates on Jansing&Co. claimed lack of bi-partisanship.  That claim is a victory for politics and bi-partisanship.  The ACA was passed under reconciliation.  It was not a Democratic bill, but a democratic bill.  If the President can be blamed(see choice/bold-underlined) for congress not getting things done, when the Republicans obstruct with filibusters.  Republicans cannot have all the changes they could get and not take credit for them by voting against the bill to claim partisanship by not being able to filibuster. 
If anything this is a vaccine to the insanity of the partisan Issa Committee which doctor for the NRA. 
Pump it up! Obama Cares !  Chris Matthews has a very interesting Stupid Conspiracy.  On the other hand, I thought that the obvious was missing in the court arguments.  I think that means that it was plain that a loss of tax break is not a penalty, or is it the semantics of taxes.

* whose weigh or beef?
** still looking for the bullet ratio aka up 'n over or held/turned [People/$]
[of and for the people, over money]
[The real in'f-fable might be taxes/commerce. The High Five ?  4GETIT?
It is a win for Politics, Bi-Partisanship, Obama, and the Economy!  But according to Raw Money?  "A Choice"... between Government standing between you and big corporations or big corporations standing between you and your health care.(Bold over underlined ? )]
Not to strike a punchline, but bottomline:  Obama is Bush! A Political Capitalist!
Romney is Kerry!  A nuanced flip-flopper.  But only in the light of...(the president speaks)***

(asterisked anachronism888baneORspeaks.)

***  TBA
[Coff E T A B L E ]
[AM H&H game change? Tweet Morning Joe! ET? MR doc RM RL btw: NFIB v. SSHH$ ]
[PC v MF ! (?)]

(photo credit)

[Hi5-4th'tableCongressISjobWON!]
[Congress is open to a peel!]

[I don't have the rest of the story to back this up, but I think that Norman Goldman analyzes NFIB v. SSHHS the way I have.  Not only that but Justice Thomas or the D$ent may have bust the fallacy that health care is commerce.  Not only that but I think that Justice Roberts figured out how it can work or not work depending on congress, as I think that congress could have if they had more cooperation rather than partisanship.  NorMan really cut through it with a caller, regarding small business and Mitt RobbedMe.  How do you know when Mitt is telling a lie?  He is either talking about Obama or economics, if not both at the same time. Just between me and we, it seems that without fully reading the Affordable Care Act or the full decision, the Supreme Court seems to have understood it better than it was argued, but not much more than I thought it was.  The catch is that we are patching together various interpretations that make a decision that still takes some tweaking by congress.  It puts taxes and states at the table.  The catch seems to hinge on the powers of congress and the definition of commerce.  As Chris Matthews was want to call it a Stupid Conspiracy, I may lean toward calling it a Swift Strategy, despite the games some play with acronyms, initialism or caricatures.]
NG
GN
UP v UC
Unprecedent President vis a vis Unprecedented Congress.
Now that is PC! Due(or vu doo) the Math!
(Bush/Obama x Obstructive/Health Care)
[I would like to thank three people for helping me understand GeOhMeTry[!] Randi Rhodes, Lawrence O'Donnel and Michael [links 6-29] Moore... Well...there are host of others but in particular RR and LO, have brilliant insight if not intel.  Randi a quick take on Obama, Lawrence an understanding of the political process, and MM a way with the message and the medium.  MR-RM.
Plausible Deniability/Plausible Incompetence/ Deniable Competence. That is the voodoo some do.
[Upheld -  U p h e l d !]

P.C.

In parsing convention or preemptive comment I will make the preemptive clause that it is better than preemptive conflict. Having said that, if it can be parsed civilly, I will pause constructively. Or rather, post concretely that I have yet to read these two that I feel may be in the balance of political craftiness.*

*Not only NFRY(not fully read yet) but link is only summary, I have a news stand copy to personally congest[!]

[!] a lazy pun on digest and play on PC or P. C.

(and or political con fusion NOT [!]**)

**

[more preemptive comment on parallel content]

FOOTNOTE PAGE FOUR APRIL 2013

4-1-13:  KNOT! No Labels / Know Tangent. Or Smith(rather) Know Labels No Tangent.[!]

4-2-13: The Real M-bed [!] ? [Follow up**?] [Now this is the ticket! See Book Ends?]

4-3-13:  See youtubes knot 4 naught ! [] (sc)

4-4-13 Knaught too Farce:  (b.s.)  A. Way, Too Point Oh?, B. Big Bagel Theory, C. D-Day, D. Freedom is not a tool., E. Lib...Ya[!] is not Free! [ :/ /: Nor mock.]

4-22-13 Not to (too) Hume or Mill ?
Happy 43rd Earthday!
(Ctrl F "Q"+"T" = ? n)
Our Story
( Connecting the Dots )
Curve Balls?
Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications.
Connecting the Dots

4-24-13 Ctrl F within P.C.? Rocket Man?[!] , Technical Difficulties (sc)[!](bazinga?)
Note on format:  There are six lines under Marathon Investigations(2) and I will forgo more than four Footnote Pages, but my last 4 inserted links were under gore,  PC, -, & PG. The reader may scroll or click but under bazinga here, un-intended links were woven or unwoven. Not just a scroll click(sc) or LOL or EVEN Steven. (Caution: Not PG ! ? under bold link)

4-30-13 : AI[!] or A to I? (b, C(c), D, E ( e ), F, G (g), h, i ) B-AM [!] BTW: there are nearly twice as many people unaware that Obamacare has begun than the extremes of intensity on gun safety legislation polling.

PC of Mini-Me

Press conference, that is!(*)
Presidential press conference on Syria Us and Con Gress.
Not to Maddow(2) or that's the ticket, but a diplomacy of preemption and word wars, not a red line of nuance.

* * * Labels PC(pre-conference) * * *
Foreign Policy
Diplomacy
Globalization
Obama Doctrine

(*) heading triggered by Hardball's Chris Matthews
No Grand Bargain nor Mini-Morph but Share 'n Angle

      ( *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *)      
First Question: Syria / Game Changer
2nd?Q: Bengazi B.S. Headline Generator
Self-Radicalizing?  Old Hats Diehard?
Mark (twain) Paul Jones?
           *   *   *   *   *   *   *
Guantanamo Dilemma and the Taliban Party.
Domestic Justice Exceptionalism and Community Divergence.
Chicken Little   State Rights
               *        *        *
(asterisk bracketed to sequester other asterisks as genre shifts)
(9*'s): press conference begins
(7*'s): genre or nuance shift [?] ! [(**)]

                  *          *(1)
[Self Radicalization and Boot Straps(3)]
(1) label added inserted "and" 
(2) Maddow
(1): anachronistically (2 too)
(2): a, B(b),C(c)
(b.s.): A, B(b), C(c)
(3) A, B(b), C(c), D!
[In time for Now!(Ann-Marie Slaughter/Tango) THE THIN RED LINE! Self Radicalization links inserted]
[PCR? Published Chemical Reaction? See Now with Alex Wagner.]
[(B S) Boot Straps (FP1) ]

[(**) all links this line inserted post-4Fp's]
[Update: Top-line links inserted and font change 5-3-13]

Marathon Investigations

Politically Motivated ?
Not to pun or pressure cookers !
Or pun on Political Calculus.
The clue is in the intialism and Ctrl F gore.
Or Genesis? OW!
(PC - PG)

[Very Circuitous Update ?]  (redacted ?][!...) 

MacGiver U.

So I've a typo. The bottom line(& link)
is that our mind is the ultimate weapon.
No special sauce, but a proper beef and grilling.

Cognitive Policy Works truthout.org
Building a Culure of Trust in Politics by Joe Brewer

The tool box is complicated and our closet can be full of hats. A tip of the cap to Steven Colbert and Michael Steele, not to mention the PC.
Should we all be inside out? [last 3 links updated 5-4-09]

Un-P.C.(Or Read Meet?)

[reference asterisk *]
[The following is posted on 5-31-12 although continuance of 5-26 material]
Cow Pies: 

QED? * http://lbo-news.com/2012/05/26/bain-actually-loves-dems/

Footnotes:
[1] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Simpson+Bowles
[2] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Bowles+Simpson
[3] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jared-bernstein/private-equity-firms-what_b_1545342.html

[4] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/05/badge-of-courage.html
[5] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/05/tar-buck.html
[6] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/05/clinton-is-full-of-bs.html
[7] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Turd

FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE SEPTEMBER 2014

Footnotes Page
in draft*
-

*(b.s.)=blog search
-
Re:labels & other blog spots.

A K A / August missing Footnotes Page
Categorical Empiricists ?**
-

** CAD (To be or not 3d) ?






9-9-14 Original Intent or in tent
(AM IT: [tan gent(~)] Andrea Mitchell ISIS Threat /-/ Witt Gen Stein/Jihadist  Defeating IS IS?
This is not to pun or purge, but to more carefully review later, the word.)


{Stop.} At this point, I will change the heading of this link from #(9-3-14) to "FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE SEPTEMBER 2014"\
-
9-9-14{nexus}
PIT Spot? 1.  T= A. PIT Schtick, B. Clause Wits (3.0)?, C. There is no Savior, :D, E: Three Clauses for ...  [any body love Rice?  Ronan Farrow Daily?]
2. Spoiler Alert? Not yet M-bed ed.
3. C-O.I.? = A.Original Intent?, B. GOP Plan to Hurt Economy, C. The Exit Strategy, D~?.  vOO due: vCR, E. Where everyone needs to read..., F. Table of Contents, G. Health Care Summit, H. Progressive Poll  I. What are the Frackin' Odds..., J.Happy Earth Day!, K.Try Angle,  L. Mess Age Monger,  M. Post-Turkey Day,  N. Nadir, O. Clause Wits, P. Romer Resigns,  Q. Go Purple!,   R. Give an inch..., S. Temporal, T. Back to "The One Thing?". @  {(~)} Future Bubble?


~: OH REALLY FOG / Catch-44
4loreMat[?]: labels 3~ NFRY, meta/slash, P.C.? [/]4Ribble! 
TRP/RBTL: 

Ghost Busters

Every thing is PC. (Politically Conceptual) 

Politics is the 4th* dimention(sic) of nature.(FP1)


* FB posting 2-25 / recreating here 2-26-14

F'n anachronism:  i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy
O W.

 

[anachronistic construction of this post, the indicated youtube(*) was not fully viewed at insert]

Tan gents ? STOP!  These inserts are like judging a blog by my model. I have only viewed one of them.  Or in computer lingo GOTO line one.  Here I will jump to a missing link, not to practice*** quantum effects***. Dimensions are not dimentions without a perspective.  (Un-M-String from Slice of Pi^)**

[Planck's Length?]

 

** hit pause @ 0:13(4M theory?)

^ Cut the Cow Pie!

*** : Geometry of Purpose , Wittgenstein

 

2-27-14 [Are we?]

Of Course Correction

Not to pun on the rock.
But I have been fishing** in the Salish Sea.
Knot that Strait [!]*

* speaking of plot lines, the bold and the but if ul, inserted last.
i.e. The Atlantic(Strait) was not read at the time of the line, and the Washington Post(But) not even yet.
**Roger that.

[Breaking***: AM - PC RC ! ]
***(9-20-13) Not certain this is the piece. But 2014 is the point in the House.

Descartes Be4 D...

...hoRsemen.

i.e.^ // e.g.



^ not for vulnerable ears (i.e. he says the ePH word and more)*

* a tangent for vulnerables minds? (i.e. different ePH words)
~
Wait, I just may have fallen into a legend trap***, ergo Decartes grid-Locke[?]
Anyway, this 3-Minute Philosophy on St. Thomas Aquinas to my listening three times, did not have the -uck word, but might still be awkward to some. 
OW < Hitchens in Mill's coffee shop. 
~

ergo:  Link 1, Decartes wiki, 2, grammar-monster 3. R-rated 3mPh "Decartes"  4. B.S. on E. G.
*1. PG-rated 3mPh "Aquinas" 2. G-rated YouTube "Mill" 3. :-) -rated YouTube "Mill" 3. P/un-rated YouTube** [i.e. = "another words", e.g. = "for example, ergo?]

** inserted link on hold.(The pun was a Wolf in Hitchens form)
e.g.  /  i.e. ~ er / go ? (I am missing a figure(guy) to be found later.)  NOT! Yet C-PC!

***
/ ->Pink Floyd
/ ->A Tale of Two Manicheans.
Cultural Threads are Fine.

Know B.S ? ! Evangelii Gaudium !

Cain un-Able

Dog gone pizza guy.

I am actually dissappointed that Cain may be un-able to represent the libertarian and wacky right in a prospective general election debate. But who knows.

Meanwhile... beetlejuice, beatle juice, Norman Goldman...podcasting has gone MO(members only).

Speaking of Voodoo or whatever I do do, in rendering and raveling the above ramble I may have met my limit*.

* for under The Big Dig are more links I've yet to count or need to count(11-03-11 or rather find).

[11-03-11: Archive for October 2011 is not all inclusive. Hence** under The Big Dig... Christie endorsed Romney / One Bad Apple / Never the Twain / Spoiler Alert! / Network Paradox- / I Heart OWS! / I'm a PC / Throwing the Game / What, Me Worry? / Take Back the American Dream / Retro-Gate / SEGUE FROM SEPTEMBER(Muffin-Gate)
Prequel*** : Occupy the Koch Brothers Battle Dream Teams]
[Minus Two Finds]
[Lincoln Search O W S]
** random (Xfinity) search of the day "Hence to cato"
***
[If anything can sum up the Voodoo that I do here: If only it were Black and White, or two dimentional or even three. (or fore)(let alone pre-determined. Not to mention Democratic wave theory, and more.]
[WE, in Kind?, or not?]

[Mediatwist? an interesting spin! Dead C Scroll over affirmative Trump. (Satire v. Sat Ire[!])]